This model offers groundbreaking field of view, and ergonomic body design. So.. is it worth it? : 740-01 PDF 12.7 MB Technical data NL Pure BANr. 8×42; 10×42; 12×42; The former two feature classic configurations. Swarovski EL’s run $2629, and the SLC’s $1799. Swarovski NL Pure - Revolutionerande handkikare med det största synfältet i sin klass. : 740-01 Instruction manual NL Pure BANr. With NL Pure, Swarovski is addressing the customers who want uncompromising quality. I am a passionate hiker, so I took the binoculars with me on a trip to the Kamnik-Savinja Alps in Slovenia. With its NL Pure, launched on 1 July 2020, Swarovski wants to immerse you in your view by offering a market-leading 71-degree ‘apparent’ field of view. The Minox was no slouch when they were my main low-power instrument - it's just that the NL is a humbling experience for it to meet. Unfortunately, your browser doesn't support these improvements. Not many reviews are out yet on the Swarovski NL Pure binos. It would not surprise me that astronomically, under dark skies, it is worth an entire half-magnitude. Med andra Swaro’s EL binos have set the industry standard since 1999 in terms of light transmission, edge-to-edge clarity, and image sharpness. gear | 07 01 2020. Not responsible for typographical or illustrative errors. Had to decide between 8x and 10x, eventually chose the former for the following reasons: - I didnt have a premium instrument at this magnification (yes, I consider the Fuji 10x50 premium). Views of the Pleiades through the 8x42 NL are also better than through the Nikon E II 10x35, I can confirm, despite the latter having greater magnification. In this review we look at the 10x42 versions of these three … Great report Peacock and congratulations on adding the little Kowa to your collection! I looked through the NL Pure 12x42 for the first time and, I admit, I felt disappointed. I still can't drive to a dark sky spot because I need new glasses. If you are here to look out for the comparison between Zeiss victory Sf Vs Swarovski El, two of the greatest binoculars in the world, You are on the right page. 80mm APO scope vs Canon 300m F4 UMS lens for AP. The forehead rest effectively lasts a lifetime whereas image stabilization ultimately is a piece of consumer electronics with a limited lifespan. From literature my understanding is that IS is meant to provide about a half magnitude gain. Several functions may not work. Edited by kcl31, 11 December 2020 - 01:22 PM. The NL Pure might feature one element more than the EL device but, at the same time, less air-to-glass surfaces (20 in the EL vs 18 in the NL Pure). Differences between Swarovski SLC and EL Binocular By Skylar ... Help me identify these binoculars By Deskstar, February/02/2021 at 12:52. : 740-02 Swarovski NL Pure 8x42 - posted in Binoculars: Just purchased a Swarovski NL Pure 8x42. Store #0906712 Elec. Well, after some luck and good timing, I was able to meet up and look through the 8x42 NL Pures. £1575.00 . When it comes to the optics we compared the NL Pure series novely with such good instruments as the Swarovski EL 10x32, the Swarovski EL 8.5x42 (two specimens from 2015 and 2017), the Nikon 12x50 SE, the Leica Ultravid BL 10x42, and the Zeiss Conquest HD 10x32. But I did sold my 10x42 IS a while ago as I find the heavy / long WX 10x50 is almost as stable as my Canon 10x42IS. The new NL pure is that good, it is better than the best. Compare Swarovski 10x42 NL Pure Binoculars vs Swarovski 8x42 NL Pure Binoculars vs Swarovski 10x50 EL50 Binoculars with FieldPro Package Green Have Questions? Slim, yet curvaceous and with a revolutionary field of view, is Swarovski's NL Pure now the ultimate birding binocular? - I intend to use it for sightseeing and landscapes. Even though, I do highly recommend to buy the NL headrest for new NL users, including 8x42 version. gear | 02 05 2018. leica trinovid 8x32 hd. SWAROVSKI NL Pure forehead rest . Went with the forehead rest with it - found that during the daytime it made a massive difference. swarovski nl pure 10x42. Add to wish list . DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging, Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights, This is not recommended for shared computers, Zenithstar 61 Dew Shield Position and Calibration Frames. I wanted something with wide field constellation views where I didn't want to worry about someone stealing it. Edited by Peacock, 14 December 2020 - 08:30 PM. Deal. $830 is a lot of cash to pony up for the upgrade to the EL’s. #0907905; Sec. How does the new NL pure 12x42 stack up against the non HD SLC 15x56? Savings: $2.30. While I am struggling to find fault with the NL Pure, all of the above comes at a price, and this for me is weight. The 8x42 NL Pure, besides having a huge field of view, offers better and deeper views on the Pleiades, with or without the forehead rest, than my 8x44 Minox BL HDs. Testing the NL Pure binoculars in the mountains. Swarovski Optik NL Pure 10×42 (left) and the 10-year-old SLC HD 10×42 (right) The NL Pure includes the latest evolution of Swarovski Optik’s proprietary high-tech lens and prism coatings. Reason being is that I have the Swarovski BTX & … Med ett synfält på hela 69° får du nästan inga kanter, utan att kompromissa om kvalitet eller ergonomi. Both the Zeiss Victory SF 8×42 and 10×42, and Swarovski EL 8.5×42 and 10x42m binoculars are premium products of their iconic makers Carl Zeiss Sports Optics and Swarovski Optik. Create a B&H Account, America's Best Customer Service List-Newsweek, Prices, specifications, and images are subject to change without notice. I have been using the NL Pure 8×42 for over a month now. This is despite giving up two millimeters of aperture. - It would not render any of my favourite binoculars obsolete (Canon 10x42 - debatable). I want the maximum true field. Even though this is likely a “money no object” comparison, it matters. Step into the magical world of Swarovski: charming jewelry, elegant watches and sparkling crystal creations commemorate the brand's tradition and craftsmanship. Currently, I have the Vortex UHD 10x42 and am looking for an upgrade to the NL-Pure's. Actually, I think that Swarovski have been very smart here, their little gadget has really earned them the first-in-vigorish. Kite APC Stabilized 12x30 binocular. Today the best of the best, the Titans of binocular quality, are the new Leica Noctivid, the updated Swarovski EL Swarovision with Field Package, and the updated Zeiss Victory SF T*.. But it is not comparable to the level of stabilization a Canon IS provides. I look forward to any further updates you may have on this fascinating instrument. Swarovski EL Swarovision HD Binoculars: Swarovski NL Pure Binoculars New Fall 2020: Swarovski SLC HD Binoculars: Sort By: Page of 4 : SWAROVSKI EL 42 & 50 Rainguard Ocular Cover Regular Price: $22.00. : Elec. Add to wish list . The first thing that jumped out for me from the Swarovski presentation was the announcement that the NL Pure binoculars improve on their current flagship range, the EL series. & Home App. We have answers. - It would not render any of my favourite binoculars obsolete (Canon 10x42 - debatable). Please enable javascript for your best B&H experience. We strive to offer our customers the easiest, most seamless shopping experience every day—using the latest technology and security measures. : 740-02 Technical data NL Pure BANr. At 840 g and even with a magnesium-based chassis, the NL Pure is 5 g heavier than the equivalent EL and a long day of field use may be difficult for some users; I would recommend using a harness in this instance. Manufacturer rebates, terms, conditions, and expiration dates are subject to manufacturers printed forms NYC DCA Lic. gear | 05 10 2020. hawke frontier hd x 8x42. I found it being helpful with my glasses on (not able to use eye cup) or one handed, and it also helps to relax some arm stress when looking up. Wondering if anyone has used them and could provide some feedback. SWAROVSKI NL Pure 10x42 binoculars . Instruction manual NL Pure BANr. £2410.00 . PS. Swarovski NL Pure 8x42 W B binocular. However, the NL clearly loses to the Fujinon 10x50 - it simply gets outmuscled and overpowered by the Porro which cost less than a quarter of the Swaro. Edited by Peacock, 08 December 2020 - 05:47 PM. Swarovski sent us a 10×42 model to test it out. SWAROVSKI EL 10x32 MKII Sandbrown Binoculars . Hd. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality. No items to compare. Took these non-budget specimens to my light-polluted balcony and compared them with some of the others in my optics trophy cabinet. Download one of these great options and you'll be on your way: Speed up future orders, see order history, create wish lists, and more. The best of the best . Mike Alibone... 17/08/2020. for the record, I too consider the Fuji fmt-sx premium. For comparison, we made sure to bring along a few of the other Swarovski siblings as well. EL 8x32 binoculars combine an ample 423 ft / 141 m field of view with an 8x magnification, which enables you to view a steady picture in any situation. In this video we do a low light comparison of the two optics side by side. You currently have javascript disabled. Gen. #0907906. Price: $2,954 Score: 9.03 The takeaway: The ELs pulled ahead with near-perfect scores for clarity and brightness, as well as balance in hand, a key factor for comfortable use.The only gripes were that the unique lugs make it difficult to use a non-Swarovski neck strap; on the upside, our editors found it a snap to swap between the company’s neck strap and harness. We close every Friday evening to Saturday evening for Shabbos. The Swarovski NL PURE is the newest innovation from Swarovski Optik. VIEW. The EL has reigned supreme for closing in on two decades because no one could build a better binocular, so Swarovski did it. So I guess the major player in terms of stabilization is mass and balance, which is coincidently same as what was already recognized in the world of movie making / filming (counter balanced / weighted cameras provide good stabilization if no optical stabilization available). Our Price: $19.70 . Read more Binoculars. I would venture as far to say that the "objective" difference between using this instrument with and without it is upwards of a thousand dollars. And that’s what it appears Swarovski has done with the release of the new NL Pure binocular range. It would be interesting to see how close the aforementioned headrest can get the NL to the canon in terms of stable star views. £108.00 . Add at least two items to compare. Dubbed SWAROBRIGHT, SWARODUR and SWAROTOP these coatings increase light transmission, reduce glare, improving image quality and protect the outer surface of the lenses. The planets looked like definite discs through the NL without any trace of flare or false color. Quick shop. On hand for this initial test was the 8x42 NL Pure, 8.5x42 EL, 8x42 EL Range and the smaller 8x32 EL. Quick shop. © 2000-2021 B & H Foto & Electronics Corp. 420 9th Ave, New York, NY 10001. Item was added to your wish list! Deal. 6: 182: By Kickboxer February/09/2021 at 18:05: NL Pure 8 vs 12x42 & EL 8x32 experience By trstahly, January/15/2021 at 17:16. However, the view through Canon IS of the planets is better - less shake and easier to discern the Galilean moons. Enter new zip code to refresh estimated delivery time. I’m particularly interested in your views of the NL pure in comparison to the 10x42. https://www.rokslide.com/swarovski-nl-pure-12x42-binocular-review The most demanding users out there will be glad to learn that there are three models scheduled for release:. Find out more what this British nature lover experienced with these binoculars. I’m a bit of a fan of wide fov viewing but find stabilisation the overriding preference, hence the 18x50IS and 10x42L IS being my main binoculars. As many will know, Swarovski EL binoculars are pretty much an icon in the industry and would certainly make it onto the list of the top three or four binoculars in the world from most impartial experts. The stars just look sparklier and there are more of them. It would have negated the majority of the edge image stabilization would have given. gear | 15 05 2017. swarovski el fieldpro 8.5x42 . The email address you entered was an invalid email. Add to wish list ... £875.00 . A bit like being outclassed by someone shorter than you in sport. Of course our photos can't say anything concrete about types of glass used in both systems. In stock for home delivery, contact us for store availability 8x magnification; 32mm objective lens ... Swarovski NL Pure 12x42. I have already purchased a new pair after the NLs - the Kowa BD II 6.5x32! Just my 2 cents, the level of stabilization that NL headrest provide is very case sensitive. gear ... gear | 15 05 2017. helios mistral wp6 8x42. I only looked through a pair once but my recollection is that they were very impressive. It seems I have developed astigmatism in my left eye over the last year and this is hindering my driving. gear | 14 05 2017. zeiss victory sf. Add to wish list . The new NL Pure in the hands of James Lees James Lees, Nature Guide and Conservation Ranger in Ontario, Canada, was one of the first people to receive a pair of our brand-new NL Pure binoculars. Serv. ... swarovski cl companion 8x30. Swarovski 8x32 EL WB FIELD PRO. No detail on why the use of the word ‘apparent’ but the new binos are a lens system the same as the Swarovski EL, so it is not digital manipulation. Quick shop. But when you are Swarovski Optik, you can afford to take your time and refine perfection. Had to decide between 8x and 10x, eventually chose the former for the following reasons: - I didn't have a premium instrument at this magnification (yes, I consider the Fuji 10x50 premium). NL Pure – a pure delight.